Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

Aguocha V. Aguocha (1986) CLR 7(d) (SC)

Judgement delivered on July 11th 1986

Brief

  • Pleadings
  • Evidence of issues not pleaded
  • Administration of estate
  • Will
  • Trust

Facts

The parties in the proceedings are members of the same family. The Plaintiff (Respondent before this Court) is the mother of one Victor Ihuese Aguocha. He died on 26th November, 1971 leaving a Will dated 29th November, 1971 in which defendant, one of his two widows, was appointed sole executrix and trustee of his estate, a large proportion of which consists of houses in Kaduna town.

In his said Will, he made provisions that his aged mother that is, the plaintiff, and some other dependants be maintained by the sole executrix and trustee of the Will. The cause of action before the Kaduna State High Court was that since the death of the testator in December 1971 and, until the time of the filing of the suit in February 1983, the defendant failed to carry out the provision to maintain the plaintiff in any shape or form whatsoever.

She pleaded and gave particulars in the statement of claim of how she spent on the average a total sum of N310.00 per months since the death of her son, the testator. The amount due and payable to her for the period from December 1971 until June 1983 amounted to N42, 793.80 and that was what she claimed. In addition, she sought for an order that so long as defendant remained the executrix and trustee of the said Will, she should continue to pay her the maintenance until her death at the rate of N310.00 per month. The defendant’s defence as contained in paragraph 3, 4 and 5 of the statement of defence reads:

  • 3
    "The Defendant denies paragraph 9, 10 and 11 of the Statement of Claim avers that the Will gives by its terms discretion to the Defendant in regard to the maintenance of the Plaintiff.
  • 4
    The Defendant further avers that she has been providing maintenance for the Plaintiff in the following manner -
    • a
      Provision of beverages for the plaintiff.
    • b
      Provision of food items such as meat, rice, beans etc. for the Plaintiff.
    • c
      Provision of toiletries for the Plaintiff.
    • d
      Periodic repairs and renovations of the Plaintiff’s house and building a toilet for the Plaintiff.
    • e
      The Defendant pleads that the Plaintiff is not entitled to the amount claimed in paragraphs 11 and 12 or any amount at all as a right under the Will.

With the pleadings settled, the issue for trial was not whether the sum of N310.00 claimed by the plaintiff monthly was excessive and unreasonable having regard to the resources of the estate. The defence was that on the correct construction of the Will there was no duty imposed to maintain the plaintiff, as the defendant had absolute discretion, whether or not to carry out the wish of the testator. That she had, in addition, absolute discretion regarding the nature, form and quantum of what maintenance to provide.

The court found for the respondent and awarded her the sum of N150.00 per month and the lump sum of N5,925.00 with an order that the former amount be paid to the respondent for the duration of her life or until the trust comes to an end, which ever came first.

Both parties appealed and the Court of appeal dismissed the appeal and varied the amount awarded by trial court to N45, 000.00 in favour of the respondent. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court.

Issues

Whether facts not pleaded in the statement of claim, and therefore not in...

Read More